Take a Look at the Below Screen Shot
This was taken by Raymond R. Buckland at Bjorn3D.com. Please notice that we were running at 53-54C, our nearest competitor was running at around 55-56C. Please check out the entire review here: Bjorn3D.com Thermal Testing Results.
Raymond's exact email:
From: Raptor [mailto:raptur@XXXXXX.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:03 PM
To: David Dalesandro
Subject: Re: Matrix II
I should mention Your quantum thrmal paste did 54C on a Core i7 920 @ 3.8GHz on water cooling. I am including a SS of a LynX Run
The Education Behind The Performance:
What makes a good thermal grease is really three things: The filler, the oil and the filler's wetability in the oil. What makes Quantum so great, is its ability to wet out the filler matrix we are using.
For over 10 years now, customers have been asking me what is the thermal conductivity - and quite frankly they are asking the wrong question. Would you trust your investment to a piece of aluminum foil? It is well over 100 W/mK - so does that make it a good thermal material? Of course not. You need the oil to allow the filler particles to eliminate any air pockets. The Quantum material does it perfectly for CPU users! The proof lies in the performance Raymond and all Quantum users have seen to date (yes - we have 100% customer satisfaction). Happy Overclocking!
